The lists are replete with persons who hold citizenship in other countries

Introduction to third party letter
I have been asked by Mr. Rafiq Khan the writer of this letter who is also an attorney-at-law whether I would accommodate the corrected version of his letter. I have agreed to do so in the interest of wider information to the public on a matter which I have previously addressed both privately to GECOM and in the press.

The upcoming general and regional elections are perhaps the most important elections since those of 1992 and every citizen has a right and a duty to vote for the list of his or her choice.

Yet I regret that I will not be exercising that right or duty come May 11, 2015. My reason has nothing to do with the ability or inability of any of the contestants to properly govern the country.

My reason is based purely on a matter of principle as I perceive it. I refuse to be an accomplice to or complicit in the perpetuation of what I regard as a constitutional illegality on this country. Some of your letter writers have already alluded to it, but it does not seem to have gained the traction that it deserves. The reason, I believe, is that all political players, to use the words of Martin Carter, “are consumed” by it.

Continue reading “The lists are replete with persons who hold citizenship in other countries”

GECOM should have referred the MMU report to the police and DPP with a view to prosecution

I welcome the report of the Gecom Media Monitoring Unit for the month of March 2015. It is well written and has not shied away from making firm conclusions on developments as it saw fit. The issue that concerns me however is what next? The March 10 “rivers of blood” editorial is not the first occasion on which the Guyana Chronicle, a state-owned newspaper, has spewed such hate. Anyone who can write with such venom is unlikely to bother with any adverse finding unless backed by some real sanction which the MMU is unable to impose, since it has no such power.

These reports might make useful reading and some of their findings will be noted in the Observers’ reports. But that would be after the elections are over and will have no practical effect on the outcome, while the hate-mongering by the Chronicle most likely will. And because the Chronicle and their employers know that, there is no reason why they would stop unless they are forced to confront the consequences of their criminal conduct.

The problem in my view lies with Gecom, which has constitutional responsibility for ensuring that elections are free and fair. The MMU is appointed by Gecom and its report should be submitted to Gecom for consideration and action. Gecom should then have immediately referred this report to the police and the Director of Public Prosecutions with a view to prosecution. It does not need any member of the public to tell Gecom that some of the matters addressed in the report point to criminal offences under at least two Acts.

Gecom must act now to address the rapid descent into outright lawlessness in this election season. Another MMU report is not likely to be published until after the May 11 election. But another report is not what we most need. Instead, we need free and fair elections in which no party or group hijacks the state media and corrupts the electoral process. And we need those who break the laws to be punished.

The world according to President Ramotar

I was in Alexander Village to attend the wake of a friend two evenings ago which coincided with a meeting of the PPP/C held at the head of the street in which I grew up. I dropped in on the meeting at a point at which President Ramotar was speaking. I heard him tell the community which enjoys not a single public space for its hundreds of children to play, about his party’s plans for world class high-tech industrial parks covering hundreds of acres; and a community which for years has endured potholes at both points of entry, of his party’s plans for an international hub for trans-Atlantic airlines to facilitate South African Airways.

He told them of his government’s decision to expend billions on a five star hotel, but not why it deprives the country’s only national university of basic requirements for teaching and learning. And of the building of the Berbice Bridge but not of the discriminatory tolls Berbicians are made to pay. He told them too about all the food items banned by Burnham but not the unbanning by Hoyte. No, such truth would destroy the party line. He told them of what the party has given the country but not that it is taxpayers’ money that the party in government has spent, and as often as not mis-spent. Or worse, what the party officials have taken for themselves and their friends.

He boasted of his party’s democratic credentials but the villagers know that they have been deprived of local democracy since 1997. He boasted too about integrity but did not tell his audience that villagers have been cheated of their investment in New Guyana Company Limited, the party controlled company.

He boasted about procurement but not his party’s failure to establish the Public Procurement Commission for fourteen years.

It was a case of everything good being the PPP while everything bad is the fault of the PNC. And the reason suggested by the President for his party not getting the credit it deserves is because of the Stabroek News, the Kaieteur News for whose publisher he reserved some choice language, and – pointing directly at Gerhard Ramsaroop and me in the audience – those “misguided” individuals who malign the record and character of the PPP.

Many years ago political meetings in Alexander Village used to allow for questions. Not so any more. So at the close of the meeting I approached Mr Ramotar and asked him directly whether he thought verbally targeting individuals in an audience would help him to win over misguided individuals.

He could offer no response.

Alexander Villagers are polite to visitors, even those who visit them only at election time.

AHI’s incorporation for the purpose of building a five-star hotel preceded every study

In his letter (‘SN should not have published Ram’s letter’ SN, April 3) Mr Winston Brassington insists that I have misrepresented the facts about the construction contract and the feasibility study for the Kingston Hotel. He persists with his “story” that a feasibility study was carried out before the signing of the construction contract and cites in support, NICIL’s Chairman and Finance Minister Dr Ashni Singh’s statement in Notice Paper No 12 of the Tenth Parliament on February 15, 2012.

That statement was made in response to a question whether there was a feasibility study done prior to agreements being signed. Dr Singh’s clever answer was: “Yes, there was a market Feasibility Study conducted by the Marriott Hotel Group and one conducted in 2010 by an independent American firm which is being updated to 2012.”

Dr Singh was asked about one thing and he answered another. A feasibility study and a market feasibility study are two very different concepts, with the latter being narrow in scope and coverage while the other is quite comprehensive. A feasibility study is a study carried out to determine the viability of a proposed project and addresses key areas such as country, political, economic, social and industry analysis, a market analysis, a technical analysis, an environmental analysis, a financial and investment analysis, analyses of production, management and supply, Porter’s Five Forces (competition) analysis, management and manpower requirements and availability, marketing and administrative expenses, and detailed financial projections with clearly articulated assumptions on cost of capital, interest, inflation and exchange rates, room occupancy by month, rack rates and discount rates for rooms. The depth of the study will be determined by the size of the investment and the risks involved.
Continue reading “AHI’s incorporation for the purpose of building a five-star hotel preceded every study”

Storm in a teacup

A violent storm has brewed in the PPP/C’s cup, spilling over to GINA, NCN, Chronicle and the Guyana Times. In the eye of the storm is whether APNU+AFC prime ministerial candidate Mr Moses Nagamootoo is a Guyanese, or an Indian.

I scrambled to check my own passport and there it was on the bio page: Nationality/Nacionalidad: Guyanese.

Hopefully, the storm will blow over and the PPP/C will raise the level and quality of their campaign to substance and issues rather than ad hominem vitriol, dead men and distortions.

And hopefully, to avoid Guyana Times’ blood pressure rising unnecessarily, I declare that I do have a Guyanese passport.